Pluto is about half the size of the next smallest planet, Mercury. However, there is no scientific reason whatsoever to pick the size of Mercury as being the size of the smallest object to be called a planet. Mercury itself is less than half the size of Mars, and Mars is only about half the size of Earth or Venus. Earth and Venus are only about one-seventh the size of Jupiter. Why not pick one-tenth the size of Jupiter as the size of the smallest planet, if the cutoff is going to be chosen arbitrarily? In that case, Mars, Mercury and Pluto would all have to be classified as asteroids. If the size-cutoff between asteroids and planets is going to be randomly chosen,...
Discovered in 1930, Pluto orbits the Sun, has three moons, has an atmosphere, has weather, and even polar caps. It is not that much different than any of the other planets. It has been known as a planet for more than 75 years, and to change its status with a poor definition and process is bad science. Pluto has earned the right to be a planet; it has been for years and for a few men to say it’s not based on a bad definition is wrong. Pluto needs to be considered a planet again, who knows what they might try to change in our solar system next.
achievement or the vague bonus scheme depends on the company’s performance rather than individual success. Furthermore, the hygiene factors such as pay policy, supervision style, social status and working condition seem to play significant role in Pluto Telecommunications. These hygiene factors in Sales department create job satisfaction as the sale staff is well paid, with greater autonomy in making decisions, high social status awareness and self –esteem. Yet, these factors, up to certain degree…
Never before visited by human spacecraft, Ceres and Pluto, as we will soon bear witness, are both evolving, changing worlds. Yesterday, Ceres and Pluto were strangers, distant, barely known runt members of our solar system. By the end of this calendar year, however, we will have showered both objects with our passion and our attention, we will have welcomed them both into our embrace. And we almost certainly will once again call both of them planets.
Essay on why pluto is not a planet - Custom paper Academic S
The efforts of a very small clique of Pluto-haters within the International Astronomical Union (IAU) plutoed Pluto in 2006. Of the approximately 10,000 internationally registered members of the IAU in 2006, only 237 voted in favor of the as a “dwarf planet” while 157 voted against; the other 9,500 members were not present at the closing session of the IAU General Assembly in Prague at which the vote to demote Pluto was taken. Yet Pluto’s official planetary status was snatched away.
pluto :: essays research papers - Free Essays, Term …
But this ignores the fact that Ceres and Pluto are structurally and compositionally very different from the numerous chunks of rocks and ice in their orbits. They are far more like the terrestrial planets than they are like tiny objects shaped only by their chemical bonds. Regardless of location, how is it scientifically accurate to classify objects with geology, weather, differentiation, and all the attributes of the larger planets with tiny shapeless rocks and iceballs?
This Research Paper Pluto: A Planet
So one reason not to consider Pluto a planet is; the different composition of the planet from all the other planets. Another main reason not to consider Pluto a planet is the size of the planet. Pluto is ridiculously small. It has a diameter of only 1,440 miles. That is 1/6 of the Earths, or less than half of Mercury’s diameter, and those are two of the smaller planets already. Seven moons in the solar system are even larger than this little ice ball of a planet. Many of the comets that lie in the Oort Cloud, a ring of billions of comets that lies far beyond Pluto, are larger than the planet itself.
Egos are the crux of the whole problem. Humans created a criteria to exclude Pluto and other dwarf planet, but we kept the terrestrials and the gas giants, I guess they had trouble counting above eight. Gas Giants and terrestrials are clearly different since it’s postulated that Jupiter would float if we could somehow float it in water. Why don’t we have 4 planets, 4 gas giants, and 3 plus dwarf planet making the population of our little solar system 11? The answer to that one is simple…scientific criteria (Latin for I don’t want to). The Greeks were probably on of the first to define what a planet was and that definition would include Pluto…and the moon, asteroids, and much of what is out there. The Greek definition was great for a millennium, the definition really started to break down in the latter part of the 20th century (a time based criteria also decided by humans). The problem came to a head in 2005 when a planet had to be redefined or the definition enhanced. The results were published in 2006 and didn’t include Pluto. All the esteemed scientists posting here can defend this to whatever degree they wish, but with the all the new discoveries a new criteria had to be developed for whatever reason motivated them. Regardless of what the minutes show it is only logical that Pluto was sitting on this human created bubble. As has been published here, some of the scientists here are trying to claim that there is nothing wrong with being a dwarf planet, so if there is nothing wrong then why not consider Pluto a planet and add dwarf status to gas giants and terrestrial planets? That was obviously not going to fly because it would upset the nice orderly scientific criteria in place. It was decided to limit the number of planets at the adult table to 8 and relegate all the new discoveries to another table. Could the real problem be that we are running out of Greek and Roman God to name the planets after so removing them from the planet club meant that a new naming criteria (there’s that word again) be developed. why isnt pluto a planet? one of the most iconic cartoon dogs is named after it! and just because its smaller than all the other planets and hides in the back doesnt mean we should forget about it or give it a demeaning name! if our solar system was high school would you want the smaller kid in the back being called a dwarf!? i mean it has been a planet for hundreds of years and all of a sudden earth becomes the big bad bully and says its not a planet! i mean im no scientist, and this may just be another read over usless opinion but it shouldnt be changed and if i had a vote i would say no! because it deserves every right as the other planets i mean what happens if our planet becomes the smallest would we be casted out to? i just think that pluto should have the right to be a planet!