Scott: If the material world is not self-existent, and it was not created by God either, then how do you explain its existence?
Terry: I don’t know and I am ok with that. There is no reason to believe that we will ever know how it all started or if it all started. I have no need to conjure up a god of the gaps to explain something there is no answer for. Making up a god to explain something is exactly how your god was created. The first theist convinced the next theist and so on and so on and so on. One of you theist lies to it and another one swears to it.
10) Absurd concepts require intense scrutiny? Your view that the concept of God is absurd must be based upon some counter-explanation for the existence of the universe and for such things as the existence of life. Otherwise, you would have no basis upon which to place this opinion. So tell us, Terry, what are your counter-explanations? Can we explain the existence of the universe by stating that it “just is,” like the atheist philosopher Bertrand Russell who declares that the universe is a “brute fact”? Don’t be shy, we would love to hear your explanations so that we can engage in an interesting debate.
9) You state: Here are some more examples of things theists have made up: God, Allah, Jesus, Heaven, Hell, Devils, Angels, Soul, Sin, Spirits, Miracles, Resurrection and Afterlife. None of these theistic terms have anything to support their existence. I am going to give you some evidence for a few of these things that you have mentioned above and you can proceed to respond to them. With regard to the existence of God, this essay provides evidence, as does my essay entitled “Is there a God? (What is the chance our world is the result of chance?)” When you reply to the “Is there a God?” essay, please try to make your reply more substantive than declaring that I have just provided another opinion despite the fact that I have cited research and scientific facts.
When you talk about the existence of the car plant, you say: “Theism says that things exist, but that they are the product of an eternally existent consciousness (God). Material things have an existence independent of our minds…in the mind of God”. While this is true for the most fundamental particles, It isn’t true for things such as the inventions of humans. Does this imply that a watch exists independent of our minds because God recognizes the watch as a watch? It would seem otherwise, becuase it is the invention of a human; but once the human is done, say, inventing his watch, does his recognition of the finality of the creation of the watch justify its objective existence external from that person? I can’t find any evidence in support of human recognition of a watch justifying its objective existence, outside of our minds.
God Doesnt Exist Because Of Suffering Philosophy Essay
You ask if the car plant exists or not. The answer is yes. Theism says that things exist, but that they are the product of an eternally existent consciousness (God). Material things have an existence independent of our minds…in the mind of God. As I discuss in God Is Real, How Modern Physics Has Discredited Atheism, modern physics has shown that the observation of a conscious observer is necessary to produce physical reality. But since humans have not always existed, there needs to be a mind which produces the physical reality in which we are participants.
Does God exist? Is there evidence for the existence of God?
One of the major objections atheists raise to the existence of God is the presence of pathogenic microorganisms. Why would God create infectious organisms to plague human beings and other animals? In this section, we will examine two classes of infectious disease—those caused by bacteria and those caused by viruses.
Does God Exist Essay | Majortests
Bacteria are single celled prokaryotes (organisms that lack a nucleus, or other membrane-bound organelles), which are mostly free-living. Bacteria are indispensible to the biomes of the world, recycling carbon and minerals from dead organisms. Bacteria are typically present at greater than 107 organisms/g in soil and makeup the vast majority of the earth's biomass (greater than 1030 organisms). In addition to their role as recyclers, some bacteria can fix carbon as photoautotrophs or chemoautotrophs. Many bacteria serve as the first trophic level in a food chain. In addition to free-living bacteria, many are commensal and/or symbiotic, living beside or within other organisms. For example, human beings are hosts to at least ten times the number of bacterial cells than their own cells. Most of these bacteria inhabit our intestines, where they serve to metabolize unused energy substrates, prevent the growth of harmful species, and produce vitamins such as biotin and vitamin K. Because of the nature of microbial activities, these organisms are required for the existence of sentient creatures. The question then arises, "What about pathogenic bacteria?" It turns out that pathogenicity is the function of a poor host-microbe response. Bacteria that have been adapted to their hosts are non-pathogenic, since killing or harming your host does not facilitate your own survival. So, the existence of pathogenic bacteria are not the result of God's creation, but the result of mutation and transfer to a less adapted host. Because of bacteria's high reproductive rate and mutation rate, it is not possible to prevent the development of pathogenic species. So, the presence of pathogenic bacteria on earth is a result of processes that are required to recycle biological materials.