Let’s shift gears to a question about religion and faith. Obviously there are people of faith on both sides of this debate. In fact, there are conservatives – traditional social conservatives, such as Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah – who support embryonic stem cell research. But could you explain how the Judeo-Christian and Western moral ethic informs your views on this issue and why you think that God is ultimately on your side?
The research climate is good here, says Minger. In 2003 his team became the first in the U.K. to grow colonies of human embryonic stem cells, and his nine-person staff is poised to nearly double. He's developing new growth culture systems that won't rely on potentially infectious mouse cells. He's also figuring out how to make stem cells morph into cardiac, neural, pancreatic, and retinal cells and preparing to test those cells in animals. And in stark contrast to how things are done in the U.S., Minger says, he's doing all this with government support—and oversight.
... FDA approved (9). The last type of stem cell known is the induced pluripotent stem cell. According Sarah Boseley, a health editor for The Guardian, induced pluripotent cells are basically adult stem cells that have been reengineered to become like embryonic stem cells that can transform into any bodily tissue or organ with the limits that obstruct adult stem cells. An example of this is when an adult stem cells is going to become a new skin cell but instead is reengineered to become a new cell is a kidney. Like with most treatments, the use of induced pluripotent cells when treating a disease or injury has its advantages and disadvantages. There are several ethical and transplant issues that arise with the use of embryonic stem cells. By using induces pluripotent stem cells two of those issues can be resolved: the first is that a patient will be using his or her own stem cells avoiding bodily rejection of the transplanted tissue, and second is you are not retrieving cells from an embryo, which is the source of much controversy, since the adult being treated has given consent (6). Unfortunately, the use of induced pluripotent stem cells still can result in problems. In clinical trials, embryonic stem cells have done a better job at differentiating. Induced pluripotent stem cells have a tendency to gravitate toward their original cell type (3). All types of stem cell research should be equally funded as they all have the potential to help patients suffering from......
Blank's adage that “stem cell research is unlikely to deliver all the goods boosters now suggest,” casts his shadow of skepticism over the worth of wasting embryos on such research. Many of these “goods” and miracles range from new organs and the reversal of diseases such as diabetes and cancers. (Embryos, 2003, para.8) Unfortunately, because of the claims over stem cell research, funding has been diverted from proven fields of medicine such as preventive medicine and endeavors in public-health awareness. Because of the current restrictions on the production of stem cells, scientists have been cornered into supplementing lack of research materials by resorting to extras produced from infertility treatments and over exaggeration of potential miracles linked this field. This has been done in hopes of attracting Congress to fund their worthy and falsely advertised campaign.
Stem Cell Research Essay Examples - New York essay
...A Civil War on Ethics For many years scientists all over the world have been fighting an ethical battle concerning morality of stem cell research. There are various opinions surrounding stem cell research and a vast amount of evidence supporting each side of this controversy. Patrick L. Taylor of children’s hospital Boston describes human embryonic stem cells as the primary cells from which cells in the body ultimately differentiate and develop. Taylor believes that advancements in stem cell research are leading to a medical revolution. Taylor lists a few things it can help with, such as insights into how organs and tissues develop, detailed knowledge of the factors that affect growth and how they interact, and dramatic new research and clinical applications (Taylor). Many people don’t believe that stem cell research is ethical. This opinion is driven mostly because of the destruction of embryos; Society sees this as murder in many cases. President Bush believes the human embryo is understood and valued in terms of its potential to become a gumanbeing. In his words, “Like a snow flake, each of these embryos is unique, with the unique genetic potential of an individual human being”. By comparison, federal policy in the United States is more circumspect insofar as there is no particular attention to the potential of the developing human embryo. If the human embryo was deserving of legal protection on the basis of potentiality, then logically the federal government would...
Argumentative Essay Against Stem Cell Research
In late 2007, researchers in the United States and Japan succeeded in reprogramming adult skin cells to act like embryonic stem cells. The new development offers the possibility that the controversy over the use of embryos could end. But many scientists and supporters of embryonic stem cell research caution that this advance has not eliminated the need for embryos, at least for the time being.
State regulation of embryonic stem cell research debate essay editing
The article reaches a conclusion as it reiterates the ignorance of pro-lifers that do not acknowledge the context in which life is initiated. The whole package that includes the circumstances by which the embryos come to be and their aim at alleviated suffering in diseases is all very positive. Because the status of embryos has received neither the mark of a living being or hasn't been cast as dead quite yet, it's dangerous to assign embryos moral status. This is especially true of those who adamantly insist that embryos are in fact living, as this could close off a sizeable opportunity for researchers to develop treatments for those afflicted with disease. As opposed to the “objectors to embryonic stem cell research [who] are being positively unethical.” (Pro-Life, 2007, para. 10)